NEWPORT SEAFOOD v. SHINE

82-02910, 82-02911; CA A30794.

691 P.2d 132 (1984)

71 Or.App. 119

In the matter of the Compensation of Keith A. Shine, Claimant. NEWPORT SEAFOOD and Ebi Companies, Petitioners, v. Keith A. SHINE, Intercontinental Motor Lines, and Mission Insurance, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 21, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin L. Mannix, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners. With him on the brief was Lindsay, Hart, Neil & Weigler, Portland.

Edward J. Harri, Albany, argued the cause for respondent Keith A. Shine. On the brief were Richard T. Kropp, and Emmons, Kyle, Kropp, Kryger & Alexander, P.C., Albany.

Thomas J. Mortland, Portland, argued the cause for respondents Intercontinental Motor Lines and Mission Insurance. With him on the brief was Breathouwer & Gilman, Portland.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.


YOUNG, Judge.

In this workers' compensation case, Newport Seafood Company (NSC), and its insurer appeal from an order of the Board that held that NSC was claimant's employer at the time of his low back injury. The Board reversed a referee's decision that Intercontinental Motor Lines (IML) was claimant's employer at the time of the injury. Responsibility is the sole issue. We affirm the Board.

NSC is a seafood processing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases