1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 688 P.2d
  5. 688 P.2d 134 (1984)
 

SHUEY v. MOULE

16-82-04952; CA A29927.

688 P.2d 134 (1984)

70 Or.App. 109

Puggy SHUEY, Appellant, v. David MOULE, John Wu, and Wu & Moule, a Co-Partnership Consisting of John Wu and David Moule, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 26, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Thomas Evans, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Leslie M. Swanson, Jr., Eugene, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Harrang, Swanson, Long &r Watkinson, P.C., Eugene.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.

VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

This is a legal malpractice case. Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendants. Viewing the record in the light most favorable to plaintiff, Stanfield v. Laccoarce, 288 Or. 659, 665, 607 P.2d 177 (1980), we conclude that there was a genuine issue of material fact raised by the record on summary judgment. We reverse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases