Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
The court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress the identification testimony. No hearing was required concerning the identification procedures at the preliminary hearing since the affidavit in support of the motion to suppress failed to set forth sworn allegations of fact indicating that the procedures were impermissibly suggestive (see United States v Gaines,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.