RON TONKIN GRAN TURISMO v. CARRUTH

8209-05970; CA A 30130.

691 P.2d 127 (1984)

71 Or.App. 81

RON TONKIN GRAN TURISMO, an Oregon Corporation, Respondent, v. Frank CARRUTH, Appellant, Convoy Company, an Oregon Corporation, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 21, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Volkman, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

E. Sean Donahue, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Black, Tremaine, Higgins, Lankton & Krieger, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARDEN and NEWMAN, JJ.


WARDEN, Judge.

Defendant Carruth appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered on plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.1 The sole assignment of error is the trial court's denial of defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. We affirm.

This action began with a complaint claiming fraud filed by plaintiff, an Oregon corporation, against Carruth, a Louisiana resident, and Convoy Company, an Oregon corporation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases