FOLLMER, RUDZEWICZ & CO. v. KOSCO

Docket Nos. 68111, 68117. (Calendar Nos. 2, 3).

420 Mich. 394 (1984)

362 N.W.2d 676

FOLLMER, RUDZEWICZ & COMPANY, PC v. KOSCO NOLTA-QUAIL-SAUER AND ASSOCIATES v. ROCHE

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided December 28, 1984.

Released January 17, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Butzel, Long, Gust, Klein & Van Zile, P.C. (by James M. Wienner), for plaintiff Follmer, Rudzewicz & Company, P.C.

Simon, Deitch, Siefman, Tucker & Friedman, P.C. (by Jay N. Siefman and Stephen P. Ormond), for defendant Kosco.

Honigman, Miller, Schwartz & Cohn (by Herschel P. Fink) for plaintiffs Nolta-Quail-Sauer and Associates and Mattingly-Chew & Associates, Inc.

Plunkett, Cooney, Rutt, Watters, Stanczyk & Pedersen P.C. (by Michael T. Lynch), for defendants Roche and Independent Agencies, Inc.


LEVIN, J.

In these cases, consolidated on appeal, the plaintiffs, who were employers of the defendants, seek to enforce against the defendants the employee's agreement to compensate his employer if, within a given period of time after termination of employment, the employee provided services for a client of his employer.

Defendant Kosco is an accountant. Defendant Roche is an insurance agent. Defendant Independent Agencies, Inc., is a Michigan corporation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases