CONTINENTAL INS. CO. v. LOCTITE CORP.

No. C0-83-1423.

352 N.W.2d 460 (1984)

CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Respondents, v. LOCTITE CORPORATION, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

As Amended July 23, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lindsay G. Arthur, Jr., Brian J. Love, Arthur, Chapman & Michaelson, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondents.

Henry A. Cousineau, Jr. and Jeffrey O. Knutsen, Cousineau, McGuire, Shaughnessy & Anderson, Chartered, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by WOZNIAK, P.J., HUSPENI and NIERENGARTEN, JJ.


OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

Loctite Corporation appeals from an order of the trial court denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial on the grounds of errors of law occurring at trial, of a verdict not justified by the evidence and that the verdicts were irreconcilable and inconsistent. We reverse.

FACTS

Mary Rustad was severely injured...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases