1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 193 N.J.
  5. 193 N.J. Super. 613 (1984)
 

BARRY v. ARROW PONTIAC, INC.

193 N.J. Super. 613 (1984)

475 A.2d 632

JAMES S. BARRY, JR., DIRECTOR OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, RESPONDENT, v. ARROW PONTIAC, INC., A CORPORATION ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 9, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric L. Chase argued the cause for appellant (Martin G. Margolis, attorney; Eric L. Chase on the brief).

Alan S. Pralgever, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; James J. Ciancia, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Alan S. Pralgever on the brief).

Before Judges BOTTER, POLOW and BRODY.

The majority opinion of the court was delivered by BRODY, J.A.D.

Adopting the findings and conclusions of an administrative law judge, respondent Director of the Division of Consumer Affairs (Division) adjudged appellant, a new car dealer, guilty of distributing in the mail an advertisement which violates N.J.A.C. 13:45A-2.2(a)(7)(iv). The advertisement states that many of its cars are "priced well below dealer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases