STATE v. HEINZ

(11930)

193 Conn. 612 (1984)

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. CURTISS HEINZ

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released July 10, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl Schuman, assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Rosita Creamer, assistant state's attorney, and Maureen Platt, deputy assistant state's attorney, for the appellant-appellee (state).

Vincent J. Trantolo, for the appellee-appellant (defendant).

SPEZIALE, C. J., PETERS, PARSKEY, SHEA and GRILLO, JS.


PETERS, J.

The principal issue in this case is whether affidavits accompanying an application for a warrant for arrest established probable cause to arrest the defendant on a charge of promoting an obscene performance. The defendant, Curtiss Heinz, was charged with four counts of promoting an obscene performance in violation of General Statutes § 53a-194, the first two counts relating to events that occurred on December 19, 1979, and the latter two counts relating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases