1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 667 S.W.2d
  5. 667 S.W.2d 135 (1984)
 

GOODMAN v. STATE

Nos. 68804, 68805.

667 S.W.2d 135 (1984)

Lois Rosalyn GOODMAN and Kathryn Voorhees Spiegel, Appellants, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

Rehearing Denied April 18, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marian S. Rosen, Allison J. Snyder, Houston, for appellants.

John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty. and Alvin M. Titus, Timothy G. Taft, and Eric Hagstette, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.

OPINION

CLINTON, Judge.

These are appeals from convictions for promotion of obscenity. A jury found appellants guilty and the court assessed punishment at a $350.00 fine.

Though appellants present 38 grounds of error for our consideration, we need reach but one, wherein appellants challenge the sufficiency of the evidence.1 After reviewing the record, we have concluded that no rational trier of fact could have found appellants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases