MATTER OF WELFARE OF R.A.D.

No. C8-84-496.

356 N.W.2d 445 (1984)

In the Matter of the WELFARE OF R.A.D.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

October 23, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerry Strauss, Stern, Levine, Lifson, Wagner & Strauss, St. Louis Park, for R.A.D.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., State of Minnesota, St. Paul, Thomas L. Johnson, Hennepin County Atty., Beverly

J. Wolfe, Asst. County Atty., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and HUSPENI and FORSBERG, JJ., with oral argument waived.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

R.A.D. appeals from a Hennepin County Juvenile Court order denying his petition for a trial de novo. He contends (1) a juvenile is entitled to a trial de novo before a judge of the juvenile court after a referee has made a recommendation to find the citation proven; (2) the evidence was insufficient to sustain the referee's findings; and (3) due process is violated when a judge who has not presided at the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases