1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 283 S.C.
  5. 283 S.C. 517 (1984)
 

EPTING v. MAYER

0324

283 S.C. 517 (1984)

323 S.E.2d 797

Chloe EPTING, Respondent, v. Janie E. MAYER, E.E. Epting, Jessie E. Koon, Ruby E. Davis, Lucille E. Barrier, Mildred E. Davis, Elberta E. Metts and Ralph E. Epting, Defendants, of whom Mildred E. Davis, Ruby E. Davis, Jessie E. Koon, Lucille E. Barrier and Elberta E. Metts are Appellants.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided November 28, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene L. Brantley and Thomas B. Jackson, III of Brantley & Jackson, P.A., Columbia, for appellants.

Joseph W. Hudgens of Pope & Hudgens, Newberry, for respondent.

Heard Sept. 20, 1984.

Decided Nov. 28, 1984.

SHAW, Judge:

This appeal involves the construction of devise in a will. The question we review is: what estate is devised to respondent Chloe Epting by Item V of Mahalie Cummings Epting's will? Item V states:

I will, devise and bequeath unto my two daughters, Eula Epting and Chloe Epting, all real estate of which I may die seized and possessed, to have...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases