1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 139 Mich.
  5. 139 Mich. App. 658 (1984)
 

BORCHARDT-SPICER v. GAF CORP.

Docket No. 67693.

139 Mich. App. 658 (1984)

362 N.W.2d 728

BORCHARDT-SPICER v. GAF CORPORATION

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided September 6, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rosenbaum, Bloom, Appel & Moses (by Lawrence A. Meyerson), for plaintiffs.

Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz (by Gary E. Murg, Russell J. Thomas, Jr. and Cindy Rhodes Victor), for defendants.

Before: WAHLS, P.J., and R.M. MAHER and C.W. SIMON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an action pursuant to MCL 37.2801; MSA 3.548(801) to recover damages and obtain injunctive relief for sexual discrimination in employment. The circuit court granted accelerated judgment for defendants, holding that plaintiffs' claims were barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the Worker's Disability Compensation Act, MCL 418.131; MSA 17.237(131). Plaintiffs appeal as of right.

In Stimson v Michigan Bell Telephone Co,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases