CASAGRANDE v. AGORITSAS

No. 84-1396.

748 F.2d 47 (1984)

Carl J. CASAGRANDE, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. James AGORITSAS, etc., et al., Defendants, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided November 19, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin Delehanty, Chestnut Hill, Mass., with whom Marshall Newman and Newman & Newman, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for plaintiffs, appellants.

Carl Valvo, Asst. Atty. Gen., Boston, Mass., with whom Francis X. Bellotti, Atty. Gen., Boston, Mass., was on brief, for defendants, appellees.

Before COFFIN and BOWNES, Circuit Judges, and WEIGEL, Senior District Judge.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs-appellants, patrolmen for the Metropolitan District Commission (MDC), brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming violation of due process and equal protection as a result of defendants' failure to follow their own promotional hiring procedures. The district court granted defendants-appellees' motion for summary judgment stating that the issues raised by the complaint were inextricably intertwined with questions decided in plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases