1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 193 N.J.
  5. 193 N.J. Super. 595 (1984)
 

GOMEZ v. MURDOCH

193 N.J. Super. 595 (1984)

475 A.2d 622

MICHAEL GOMEZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. RUPERT MURDOCH, RAY KERRISON AND NEWS GROUP PUBLICATIONS, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 6, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven L. Kessel argued the cause for appellant (Drazin and Warshaw, attorneys).

Slade R. Metcalf, member of New York bar and of the firm of Squadron, Ellenoff, Plesent & Lehrer, argued the cause pro hac vice for respondents; Winne, Banta & Rizzi, of counsel; Donald A. Klein on the brief.

Before Judges ANTELL, JOELSON and McELROY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by JOELSON, J.A.D.

This appeal involves a libel action. Plaintiff, a professional jockey, filed a complaint based upon an article by defendant Kerrison in a daily newspaper, the New York Post. The complaint alleges that "defendant Murdoch is the publisher of ... the New York Post, which is published by defendant, News Group Publications, Inc. [sic]...." Defendants made...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases