1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 354 N.W.2d
  5. 354 N.W.2d 426 (1984)
 

RETTMAN v. CITY OF LITCHFIELD

No. C1-83-1091.

354 N.W.2d 426 (1984)

Edward RETTMAN, Jr., Respondent, v. CITY OF LITCHFIELD, et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Rehearing Denied October 8, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George H. Neperud, Litchfield, for appellants.

Brian M. Olsen, Cokato, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.

WAHL, Justice.

This appeal raises the issue of whether quasi-contractual relief is available to a provider of services for a project initiated under Minn.Stat. ch. 429 (1982), governing local improvements and assessments, where the parties failed to comply with the procedures mandated by chapter 429. The jury found that the City of Litchfield (hereinafter city) had led plaintiff Edward Rettman to believe he was hired to install a water main extension on his development...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases