1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 681 P.2d
  5. 681 P.2d 93 (1984)
 

IN RE MAGAR

SC 29172.

681 P.2d 93 (1984)

296 Or. 799

In re Complaint As to the Conduct of MAGAR E. Magar, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided April 17, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Magar E. Magar, Portland, pro se.

Robert L. Kirkman, Portland, argued the cause for the Oregon State Bar. With him on the brief was W. Eugene Hallman, Pendleton.

Before LENT, P.J., and LINDE, CAMPBELL, ROBERTS, CARSON and JONES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In this disciplinary proceeding the Oregon State Bar, by its second amended complaint, alleges nine causes against the accused of violations of the disciplinary rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility.

Causes One through Three arise out of the accused's representation of Lea Lakeside in a bankruptcy proceeding.

Causes Four through Six involve the accused's representation of Robert J. Snyder in a bankruptcy proceeding.

Cause...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases