MADEJ v. DOE


194 N.J. Super. 580 (1984)

477 A.2d 439

ANN MADEJ AND EDWARD MADEJ, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS, v. JOHN DOE (A FICTITIOUS PERSON TRADING AS JOHN'S TEXAS WEINERS), RICHARD ROE (A FICTITIOUS PERSON), FIGOLIA INC. CORPORATION, LIGHTING ELECTRIC COMPANY, CITY OF NEWARK, COUNTY OF ESSEX, STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND THE "X" INC. CORPORATION, A FICTITIOUS NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Essex County.

Decided January 27, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allan Serratelli for plaintiffs Ann Madej and Edward Madej.

Abilio Mendez for defendant City of Newark (John J. Teare, Corporation Counsel of the City of Newark, attorney).

Madeleine W. Mansier, for defendant State of New Jersey (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, attorney).

Vincent R. Glorisi for defendant Figolia Inc. Corporation (Hoagland, Longo, Oropollo & Moran, attorneys).


VILLANUEVA, J.S.C.

This is a motion for summary judgment by defendant, State of New Jersey, to dismiss the complaint and all cross-claims brought against it and a motion for summary judgment by defendant, City of Newark, to dismiss a per quod claim against it. The issues are whether a notice of claim "against the City of Newark" that makes no mention of the State, which is served both upon the City and the State, constitutes a valid notice of claim against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases