OPINION
MENZA, J.S.C.
The defendant is charged with robbery and burglary. The State moves to introduce into evidence, in lieu of actual testimony, the videotaped deposition of the victim because the witness is ill and unable to appear in person at the trial. The defendant objects to the introduction of the videotape contending that R. 3:13-2 does not specifically provide for the use of a videotaped deposition in a criminal trial.
R.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.