STATE v. HOFFMAN

M207283, 84; A28082.

677 P.2d 72 (1984)

67 Or.App. 54

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Jerry A. HOFFMAN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 22, 1984.

Reconsideration Denied April 6, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Smolak, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Richard D. Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and WARDEN and YOUNG, JJ.


GILLETTE, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was convicted of driving while suspended and of having an expired vehicle license. He appeals, contending inter alia that (1) he should have been allowed to argue to the jury that it has the power under Oregon Constitution, Article I, section 16, to disregard the judge's instructions; (2) handwritten statements on an envelope mailed to defendant by the Motor Vehicle Division were inadmissible hearsay; and (3) the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases