VALENTINE v. CONTICOMMODITY SVS, INC.

No. C2-83-452.

344 N.W.2d 405 (1984)

Fred J. VALENTINE, Appellant, v. CONTICOMMODITY SVS, INC., et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

February 24, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rauenhorst & Associates, Arden Hills, for appellant.

John Berg, Minneapolis, for respondents.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


TODD, Justice.

This case involves an action by an investor seeking damages and punitive damages for alleged wrongful, erroneous and negligent trading in his commodities futures trading account. The commodities brokerage company, Conticommodity Services, Inc. (Conti), sought summary judgment on the dual grounds that plaintiff 1) agreed in his customer agreement to arbitrate any disputes and 2) failed to demand arbitration within the 1-year time limitation. Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases