1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 351 N.W.2d
  5. 351 N.W.2d 396 (1984)
 

SETTER v. MAURITZ

No. C6-84-397.

351 N.W.2d 396 (1984)

Angela M. SETTER and Ronald Setter, Appellant, v. John MAURITZ, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

July 10, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary Manka, Minneapolis, for appellants.

Rodney G. Grimes, Bloomington, for respondent.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and NIERENGARTEN and RANDALL, JJ., with oral argument waived.

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Appellants challenge the trial court's interpretation and application of the jury's answers to a special interrogatory verdict. Respondent claims appellants' appeal is defective and should be dismissed.

Dismissed.

FACTS

At trial, liability having been stipulated to, the trial court submitted a special interrogatory verdict to the jury for a determination of appellants' damages. The jury found as follows...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases