WIDMAN v. PECO MFG. CO.

WCB No. 81-04271; CA A26833.

674 P.2d 70 (1984)

66 Or.App. 472

In the matter of the Compensation of Lorrie L. WIDMAN, Claimant. Lorrie L. Widman, Petitioner, v. PECO MANUFACTURING COMPANY AND EBI COMPANIES, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 11, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glenn M. Feest, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

John M. Pitcher, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Emil R. Berg and Griffith, Bittner, Abbott & Roberts, Portland.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


ROSSMAN, Judge.

Claimant seeks reversal of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board which affirmed the carrier's denial of her hand condition. We hold that she has established the compensability of the hand condition by a preponderance of the evidence. Accordingly, we reverse.1

On February 19, 1981, claimant began her employment with Peco Manufacturing Company (Peco). Her previous employment had included working as a barmaid...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases