TIELSCH v. CITY OF ANAHEIM

Docket No. 34093.

160 Cal.App.3d 576 (1984)

206 Cal. Rptr. 740

GEORGE P. TIELSCH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF ANAHEIM et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

September 28, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Banks, Leviton, Drass & Kelsey and Seth J. Kelsey for Plaintiff and Appellant.

William P. Hopkins, City Attorney, Robert O. Franks, Assistant City Attorney, and Louis L. Selby, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

CROSBY, J.

In the previous episode, we upheld the superior court's denial of George P. Tielsch's petition for extraordinary relief because it was premature and brought under the wrong code section. While that appeal was pending, Tielsch petitioned anew, this time pursuant to the proper statute — Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5 et seq.; but now he has acted too late. Tielsch filed his petition 93 days after the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases