KABATNIK v. WESTMINSTER CO.

No. 8418SC423.

323 S.E.2d 398 (1984)

Jaroslav J. KABATNIK v. WESTMINSTER COMPANY.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

December 18, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Turner, Rollins, Rollins & Clark by Clyde T. Rollins, Greensboro, for plaintiff-appellee.

Smith, Patterson, Follin, Curtis, James & Harkavy by Norman B. Smith, Greensboro, for defendant-appellant.


HILL, Judge.

Defendant brings forth three assignments of error concerning his motion for directed verdict under Rule 50(a) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, admissibility of evidence, and instructions to the jury. We have examined each of the assignments and find no basis for reversal.

The first question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant's motion for directed verdict. Defendant contends he was entitled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases