TATE v. STATE

6 Div. 410.

455 So.2d 263 (1984)

Howard TATE v. STATE.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Rehearing Denied July 31, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Shan Paden of Paden, Green, Paden & Bivona, Bessemer, for appellant.

Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and J. Callen Sparrow, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


BOWEN, Presiding Judge.

Howard Tate appeals from the summary dismissal of his pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus. The petition alleged that "all disciplinary actions taken against him does not satisfy the due process requirements of Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974), where disciplinary committee findings and reasons for actions taken are not reasonably specific." The petition does not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases