EATON v. ENGELCKE MANUFACTURING

No. 10812-3-I.

37 Wn. App. 677 (1984)

681 P.2d 1312

JOHN EATON, Respondent, v. ENGELCKE MANUFACTURING, INC., Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

May 29, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Krider, Gough & O'Callahan, Inc., P.S., and James H. Krider, for appellant.

Shields & Clarke and Michael A. Clarke, for respondent.


RINGOLD, J.

Engelcke Manufacturing, Inc. (Engelcke) appeals a judgment awarding $5,415 to John Eaton for services rendered in developing a schematic design for an electronic parlor game. Engelcke contends that Eaton's recovery was improperly based on implied contract and quantum meruit because the parties had an express contract barring recovery and Engelcke received nothing of value from Eaton. We affirm.

The facts as found by the trial court are not challenged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases