ght" content="200">
Leagle.com Leagle.com Leagle.com
Sign in
 

BHANDARI v. WASHINGTON HOSPITAL GROUP

No. A128457.

BHUPINDER BHANDARI, M.D., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WASHINGTON HOSPITAL GROUP et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

Filed June 22, 2011.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

NEEDHAM, J.

Washington Hospital and other defendants1 appeal from an order denying their special motion to strike respondent's complaint under the anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) statute. (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16.) They contend the court erred in ruling that the causes of action against them did not arise from activity protected by the statute, because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases

    MINER v. DEPT. OF EMPLOYM | 475 A.2d 233 (1984) | 5a2d2331704 | Leagle.com
     

    MINER v. DEPT. OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING

    No. 82-328.

    475 A.2d 233 (1984)

    James MINER v. DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING.

    Supreme Court of Vermont.

    March 2, 1984.


    Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

    Thomas W. Costello, Brattleboro, John Roemer, Putney, for plaintiff-appellant.

    Matthew R. Gould, Steven J. Kantor, Montpelier, for defendant-appellee.

    Before BILLINGS, C.J., and HILL, UNDERWOOD, PECK and GIBSON, JJ.


    HILL, Justice.

    The employer, Fleming Oil Company (Company), appeals a determination by the Employment Security Board (Board) allowing the claimant-employee's claim for unemployment benefits. The Board upheld the ruling of the appeals referee who concluded that the claimant left the Company with good cause attributable to the Company. 21 V.S.A. § 1344(a)(2)(A). We affirm.

    The claimant began his job with the Company as an apprentice mechanic. He assumed...

    Let's get started

    Leagle.com

    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
    Sign on now to see your case.
    Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

    • Updated daily.
    • Uncompromising quality.
    • Complete, Accurate, Current.

    Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

    Cited Cases

    • No Cases Found

    Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

    Citing Cases