1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 678 S.W.2d
  5. 678 S.W.2d 28 (1984)
 

CENTRAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC. v. INGRAM

678 S.W.2d 28 (1984)

CENTRAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Henry Preston INGRAM, Richard B. Goostree, James C. Bjorkholm, Jr., and Ingram & Associates, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville.

September 17, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank C. Gorrell, Jay S. Bowen, Judith A. Powell, Nashville, for plaintiff-appellant.

Fred D. Thompson, Ronald W. Routson, Nashville, for defendants-appellees.

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

This appeal under Rule 11, Tenn.R. App.P., involves non-competition clauses in employment contracts. It raises an issue regarding the consideration necessary to support such a covenant when it is entered into after employment has begun. In addition, the Court addresses the issue of whether a covenant not to compete, the geographic and time limitations of which are unnecessarily broad, can be judicially modified so as to make the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases