1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 317 S.E.2d
  5. 317 S.E.2d 385 (1984)
 

STATE v. FOUST

No. 624A83.

317 S.E.2d 385 (1984)

STATE of North Carolina v. Theodore Morris FOUST.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 6, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen. Isham B. Hudson, Jr., Raleigh, for the State.

Asst. Appellate Defender Ann B. Petersen, Raleigh, for defendant.

COPELAND, Justice.

Defendant brings forward three assignments of error which he contends require a new trial. We disagree and affirm the sentences imposed.

Under the first assignment, the defendant contends that the court erred in permitting the State to introduce evidence concerning the percentage of rayon fibers produced in the United States, on the grounds that such evidence was inadmissible hearsay as well as irrelevant.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases