1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 155 Cal.App.3d
  5. 155 Cal.App.3d 547 (1984)
 

SCHWARTZ v. CITY OF ROSEMEAD

Docket No. 68149.

155 Cal.App.3d 547 (1984)

202 Cal. Rptr. 400

MARK SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF ROSEMEAD et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

May 8, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

O'Neill & Huxtable and Leroy A. Abelson for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Robert L. Kress, City Attorney, Wallin, Kress, Reisman, Price & Dilkes, Cary S. Reisman, Latham & Watkins and Peter H. Benzian for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

LUI, Acting P.J. —

SUMMARY

This appeal challenges the trial court's judgment insofar as it denies appellant attorneys fees requested pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 (section 1021.5).1

Appellant Mark Schwartz (Schwartz) successfully obtained a writ of mandate ordering the City of Rosemead (City) to conduct an environmental assessment pursuant to the provisions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases