1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 586 F.Supp.
  5. 586 F.Supp. 113 (1984)
 

HANSROTE v. AMER INDUS. TECHNOLOGIES

Civ. A. No. 81-218.

586 F.Supp. 113 (1984)

George HANSROTE, Plaintiff, v. AMER INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

June 7, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Messina, Johnstown, Pa., Louis Alvin, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Stanley Stein, Feldstein, Grinberg, Stein & McKee, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

TEITELBAUM, Chief Judge.

In the trial of this diversity action plaintiff George Hansrote claimed the termination of his employment relationship by defendant Amer Industrial Technologies, Inc. (Amer) breached his contract of employment for a specific number of years or a reasonable period of time and was in violation of public policy and therefore a wrongful discharge. The jury returned a verdict for Hansrote and Amer moves for judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases