Judgment affirmed.
Defendant contends that his application to suppress identification testimony should not have been denied without a Wade hearing. However, his supporting papers failed to allege any facts in support of the motion, and, thus, summary denial was proper (CPL 710.60, subds 1, 3, par [b]; People v Wicker,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.