Judgment affirmed.
There was no evidence in the record from which it could be concluded that the police knew or should have known, at the time that they questioned defendant with respect to the instant offenses, that he was represented by counsel on a prior, pending charge. Defendant's statement, therefore, was properly admitted at trial (see, e.g., People v Bartolomeo,
We have considered...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.