1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 283 S.C.
  5. 283 S.C. 402 (1984)
 

HAMM v. S.C. PUBLIC SERV. COMM.

22190

283 S.C. 402 (1984)

323 S.E.2d 780

Steven W. HAMM, Consumer Advocate for the State of South Carolina, Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION and South Carolina Electric and Gas Company, Respondents.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided November 29, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymon E. Lark, Jr., Lee Jedziniak and Stephen W. Hamm, S.C. Dept. of Consumer Affairs, Columbia, for appellant.

Arthur G. Fusco and Sarena K. Dickerson of S.C. Public Service Com'n, Columbia, for respondent, S.C. Public Service Com'n.

William F. Austin of Austin & Lewis, Patricia T. Marcotsis of S.C. Electric & Gas Co., and James B. Richardson of Ham and Richardson, Columbia, for respondent, S.C. Electric & Gas Co.

Heard Oct. 2, 1984.

Decided Nov. 29, 1984.

CHANDLER, Justice:

These consolidated appeals are from Circuit Court Orders affirming Orders of Respondent Public Service Commission (PSC), which approved a method used by Respondent South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (the Utility) to bill its customers for a rate increase.

We affirm.

This litigation arises from the use of a proration method...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases