1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 342 N.W.2d
  5. 342 N.W.2d 341 (1984)
 

STATE v. RANDA

Nos. CX-82-1063, C1-82-1064.

342 N.W.2d 341 (1984)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Charles B. RANDA, Appellant (CX-82-1063), Bradley Anderson, Appellant (C1-82-1064).

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

January 13, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey R. Besikof, West St. Paul, for appellants Randa and Anderson.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Norman B. Coleman, Jr., Jerry Anderson, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., St. Paul, John P. Dimich, Itasca County Atty., Grand Rapids, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.

SCOTT, Justice.

We have consolidated these two separate criminal appeals for the purpose of decision. Both defendants were convicted of possessing marijuana.1 The issues raised in both appeals relate to the validity of warranted searches based on the same affidavit. We affirm both convictions.

1. Both defendants raise first the issue of the facial validity of the affidavit filed in support of the search warrant applications. We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases