MAURICE RIVER BD. OF EDUC. v. MAURICE RIVER ETC.


193 N.J. Super. 488 (1984)

475 A.2d 59

MAURICE RIVER TP. BD. OF EDUC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MAURICE RIVER TOWNSHIP TEACHERS ASSOCIATION AND NEW JERSEY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 22, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rushton H. Ridgway argued the cause for appellant (Milstead & Ridgway, attorneys; Louis G. Rubino on the brief).

Steven R. Cohen argued the cause for respondents (Selikoff & Cohen, attorneys).

Before Judges BISCHOFF, PETRELLA and BRODY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BISCHOFF, P.J.A.D.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether the Maurice River Township Teachers Association (Association) may record by means of videotape the public meetings of the Township Board of Education (Board). The trial court, in an opinion published at 187 N.J.Super. 566 (Ch.Div. 1982), held that it could. We affirm....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases