1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 356 N.W.2d
  5. 356 N.W.2d 323 (1984)
 

HUNT v. ESTATE OF HANSON

No. C8-84-191.

356 N.W.2d 323 (1984)

Jean W. HUNT, Respondent, v. ESTATE OF Arthur Elmer HANSON and Bertha Hanson, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied January 9, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin Berg, Roseau, for respondent.

Dennis M. Sobolik, Brink, Sobolik, Severson, Vroom & Malm, P.A., Hallock, for appellants.

Heard, considered and decided by PARKER, P.J., and FOLEY and HUSPENI, JJ.

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Appellants-Estate of Arthur Elmer Hanson and Bertha Hanson (Hansons), appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of respondent-Jean W. Hunt and from the trial court's order denying the Hansons' motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial. The jury found that the Hansons used their farmland unreasonably so as to interfere with the flow of water on Hunt's farmland, causing him damages...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases