1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 140 Ariz.
  5. 140 Ariz. 539 (1984)
 

KEMPTON v. CITY OF SAFFORD

No. 2 CA-CIV 4884.

140 Ariz. 539 (1984)

683 P.2d 338

Calvin L. KEMPTON and Hermoine Kempton, his wife, and James W. Linseth and Nora Linseth, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. The CITY OF SAFFORD, a municipal corporation, Defendant/Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Arizona Division 2.

Review Denied June 5, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anderson & Welker, P.C. by Dudley S. Welker, Safford, for plaintiffs/appellees.

Richardson & Mortensen by Wilford R. Richardson, Safford, for defendant/appellant.

OPINION

BIRDSALL, Chief Judge.

The appellees are taxpayers owning and residing on property located within the boundaries of an area claimed to have been annexed to the City of Safford by Ordinance # 264. They were successful in the trial court, the court declaring the ordinance invalid and of no force and effect.

On appeal the City of Safford, appellant, presents the following legal issues:

1) Did Thatcher Ordinance # 45 and Safford Ordinance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases