CEDAR-AL PRODUCTS v. CHAMBERLAIN

No. 6357-3-II.

38 Wn. App. 626 (1984)

687 P.2d 880

CEDAR-AL PRODUCTS, INC., Respondent, v. ROBERT CHAMBERLAIN, ET AL, Appellants.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.

September 5, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lane J. Wolfley, for appellants.

Christopher O. Duffy, for respondent.


REED, J.

PAWest and Cedar-al are rival manufacturers of pet pillows. Cedar-al sought injunctive relief and damages after PAWest began marketing a pet pillow which Cedar-al claimed imitated the trade dress of its product. In granting Cedar-al's motion for summary judgment, the trial judge decided, as a matter of law, that the pillows so closely resemble each other that an ordinary consumer would likely mistake one for the other. PAWest maintains that the pet pillows...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases