DAKE v. MUTUAL OF OMAHA INS. CO.

No. C84-808.

600 F.Supp. 63 (1984)

Mary Ann DAKE, Plaintiff, v. MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY, United of Omaha Insurance Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D.

November 29, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven F. Mitchell, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Curtiss Isler, Tom McDonald, Arter & Hadden, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants.


ORDER GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KRENZLER, District Judge.

In this case, plaintiff Mary Ann Dake claims that she was illegally discriminated against on the basis of age when her contracts to sell insurance for Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company and United of Omaha Insurance Company were terminated. The complaint also contains two state claims based upon breach of contract and fraud.

Defendants have filed a motion for partial summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases