PEOPLE v. GIULIANO


102 A.D.2d 559 (1984)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Giuliano, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

July 12, 1984


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irving Anolik and Morris D. Weintraub for appellant.

Harold Kenneth King, Jr., of counsel (Steven R. Kartagener with him on the brief; Mario Merola, District Attorney, attorney), for respondent.

CARRO, J. P., and ASCH, J., concur with FEIN, J.; KASSAL, J., concurs in an opinion; MILONAS, J., dissents in a separate opinion.


FEIN, J.

There should be an affirmance in this wholly circumstantial evidence case. If believed by the jury, as apparently it was, the evidence was sufficient to exclude to a moral certainty every conclusion other than guilt.

As stated in People v Kennedy (47 N.Y.2d 196, 202): "[T]he conclusion of guilt must be consistent with and flow naturally from the proven facts, and * * * those facts viewed as a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases