HAPPY 40, INC. v. MILLER

No. 595, September Term, 1983.

57 Md. App. 589 (1984)

471 A.2d 333

HAPPY 40, INC. ET AL. v. STEPHANIE MILLER.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

February 10, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel J. Moore, Baltimore, with whom were Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, Baltimore, on brief, for appellants.

William G. Kemp, Elkton, with whom were Thomas L. Kemp and Kemp & Kemp, P.A., Elkton, on brief, for appellee.

Argued Before GILBERT, C.J., and LOWE and ADKINS, JJ.


ADKINS, Judge.

Because less than all the claims presented in this case were finally adjudicated, and because the Circuit Court for Cecil County made no express determination that there was no just reason for delay and gave no express direction for entry of final judgment as to less than all the claims, Md.Rule 605 a compels us to dismiss this appeal.

The factual and procedural background of the case is simple enough. In January 1982, appellee Stephanie Miller...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases