PETTINATO v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

No. 1 CA-IC 3164.

144 Ariz. 501 (1984)

698 P.2d 746

Vincent PETTINATO, Petitioner Employee, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, CTI, Inc., Respondent Employer, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Respondent Carrier.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Department C, Division 1.

Reconsideration Denied February 5, 1985.

Review Denied February 20, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Davis, Eppstein & Hall, P.C. by Philip Hall, Tucson, for petitioner employee.

Sandra A. Day, Chief Counsel, Indus. Com'n of Arizona, Phoenix, for respondent.

Kimble, Gothreau, Nelson & Cannon, P.C. by Michael J. Gothreau, Deborah Bernini, Daryl A. Audilett, Tucson, for respondent employer and respondent carrier.


OPINION

OGG, Judge.

The issue in this special action review of an Industrial Commission award dismissing respondents' request for hearing is whether the administrative law judge erred in denying claimant's request for attorneys' fees and costs. Because the administrative law judge had neither statutory nor rule authority to award attorneys' fees and costs, we affirm the award.

On March 21, 1977, claimant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases