1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 195 N.J.
  5. 195 N.J. Super. 444 (1984)
 

LAZORICK v. BROWN

195 N.J. Super. 444 (1984)

480 A.2d 223

FRANCINE LAZORICK AND FRANK AND ANN LAZORICK, HER PARENTS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. J. DUFF BROWN, M.D., KURT MANRODT, M.D., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 31, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig S. Combs argued the cause for appellants (Giblin, Combs & Cooney, attorneys; Craig S. Combs and Thomas F. Quinn, on the brief).

Arthur I. Miltz argued the cause for respondents (Kronisch and Schkeeper, attorneys; Arthur I. Miltz, on the brief).

Before Judges BOTTER, PRESSLER and O'BRIEN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BOTTER, P.J.A.D.

This is a medical malpractice action against two doctors, Dr. Brown and Dr. Manrodt. After being treated by them plaintiff Francine Lazorick came under the care of Dr. Galton and Dr. Needle. The issue on this appeal is whether defendants should be barred from calling Dr. Galton and Dr. Needle as witnesses because defense counsel spoke with them and received reports

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases