1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 476 A.2d
  5. 476 A.2d 161 (1984)
 

HAMILL v. MILLER

No. 198, 1983.

476 A.2d 161 (1984)

Betty D. HAMILL, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Robert H. MILLER, Defendant Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: May 3, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward T. Ciconte and Jeffrey P. Wasserman, of D'Angelo, Ciconte & Roseman, Wilmington, for appellant.

Stephen P. Casarino, of Tybout, Redfearn, Casarino & Pell, Wilmington, for appellee.

Before HERRMANN, C.J., McNEILLY and CHRISTIE, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

In this case the Court must review the situation which was created in a trial court by a leading question which placed an inadmissible and somewhat prejudicial inference of fact before a jury in a civil case.

In Superior Court the plaintiff alleged that she was injured because defendant negligently operated his motor vehicle on the wrong side of the roadway in violation of 21 Del.C. § 4114(a).

During the civil jury trial plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases