1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 479 A.2d
  5. 479 A.2d 149 (1984)
 

CONDOSTA v. GRUSSING

No. 83-212.

479 A.2d 149 (1984)

Guido CONDOSTA v. Robert GRUSSING, William M. McCarty & Rosalie Condosta.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

June 8, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Guido Condosta, pro se.

Richard A. Hull and Frank H. Zetelski of Dick, Hackel & Hull, Rutland, for defendant-appellee Grussing.

Anthony B. Lamb and Jane H. Marter of Paul, Frank & Collins, Inc., Burlington, for defendant-appellee McCarty.

Before BILLINGS, C.J., and HILL, UNDERWOOD, PECK and GIBSON, JJ.

BILLINGS, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff Condosta appeals from an order of the Windham Superior Court granting defendants' motions to dismiss his complaint on the ground that the complaint failed to state a cause of action upon which relief could be granted. V.R.C.P. 12(b)(6). This is the eighth time the plaintiff has appeared before this Court pursuing appeals on matters stemming from an original divorce action between him and defendant Rosalie Condosta. Condosta v...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases