1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 616 F.Supp.
  5. 616 F.Supp. 10 (1984)
 

TAT BA v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N.A.

No. 83 Civ. 9421 (EW).

616 F.Supp. 10 (1984)

TAT BA, Plaintiff, v. The CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N.A. and Citibank, N.A., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

October 30, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Evans, Koelzer, Osborne & Kreizman, New York City, for plaintiff; Joel Kreizman, New York City, of counsel.

Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, New York City, for defendant The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.; Paul T. Shoemaker, New York City, of counsel.

Shearman & Sterling, New York City, for defendant Citibank, N.A.; Jennifer Freeman, Rachel E. Deming, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

Defendants, The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. ("Chase") and Citibank, N.A. ("Citibank"), move pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that it is barred by the applicable statute of limitations.

The allegations of the complaint are deemed admitted for the purposes of this motion.1 Plaintiff, a citizen of the "former Republic of Vietnam" who now resides...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases