HAUENSTEIN v. LOCTITE CORP.

No. C4-82-1396.

347 N.W.2d 272 (1984)

Ward HAUENSTEIN, Appellant, v. The LOCTITE CORPORATION, Respondent, S.H. ANSELL COMPANY, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Michael P. REDMOND and Charles K Sumner, etc., Third-Party Defendants.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

April 20, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ralph E. Koenig, and Michael L. Weiner, Minneapolis, for appellant.

R.D. Blanchard, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


PETERSON, Justice.

This is a personal injury action brought by appellant, Ward Hauenstein, seeking damages for a serious injury sustained to one of his eyes while using Loctite Retaining Compound No. 35 (RC-35), an adhesive produced by respondent, The Loctite Corporation.1 Hauenstein alleged that Loctite was strictly liable and liable in negligence solely for failure to warn Hauenstein that RC-35 contained acrylic acid and could cause...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases