Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
There was sufficient evidence to support the determination that petitioner (1) maintained a second bar on the premises, in violation of subdivision 4 of section 100 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law and (2) abetted the sale of alcohol at an unlicensed premises, in violation of 9 NYCRR 53.1 (h) and subdivision 1 of section 100 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.