1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 160 Cal.App.3d
  5. 160 Cal.App.3d 446 (1984)
 

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO v. LOEB

Docket No. 22891.

160 Cal.App.3d 446 (1984)

206 Cal. Rptr. 626

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. AL M. LOEB, as Director, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. AL M. LOEB, as Director, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

September 27, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, N. Eugene Hill, Assistant Attorney General, and Robert L. Mukai, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendants and Appellants.

L.B. Elam and Richard J. Moore, County Counsel, Anthony L. Wright and Charles L. Harrington, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

CARR, Acting P.J.

In these consolidated proceedings, respondent state officers and agencies (hereafter the State) appeal from the granting of a peremptory writ of mandate to plaintiffs County of Sacramento and the County of Alameda (hereafter the Counties). The dispute centers on the Counties' claims against the State for amounts concededly underpaid in previous fiscal years for the State's share of expenditures under the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases